Webberley on Linehan v Brooks: beyond the behaviour

Dr Webberley examines the distinction between genuinely unacceptable conduct and behaviour that is simply disagreeable or offensive.

The question of where we draw the line between behaviour that is truly unacceptable and behaviour that is merely unattractive, annoying or irritating is one I'm asked about regularly. It matters because the distinction shapes how we respond, both individually and collectively.

In looking at the Linehan v Brooks case, I've considered what actually constitutes unacceptable conduct in professional and public contexts, and where discomfort or disagreement sits in relation to genuine harm. The answer is not always straightforward, and context matters enormously.

Read the full piece to explore my thoughts on this distinction and what it means for how we engage with difficult conversations.