Why do schools say 'girls (assigned female at birth)' and is this harmful?

Some schools use the phrase 'girls (assigned female at birth)' in communications about activities or facilities, typically as an attempt to be clear about their policies. However, research indicates this language can be exclusionary and harmful to transgender students, as it specifically excludes transgender girls from participating with their peers in activities that align with their gender identity.

Evidence from educational psychology shows that exclusionary language in schools can negatively impact students' wellbeing and sense of belonging. When schools use terminology that distinguishes between different types of girls, it sends a message that transgender girls are not considered authentic members of their gender group. This approach often forces young people into impossible choices: either miss out on activities entirely or participate with a gender group that does not match their identity, both of which can cause significant distress.

Educational guidelines increasingly recommend inclusive language that treats all students according to their lived gender identity rather than sex assigned at birth. Schools that simply use 'girls' or 'boys' without additional qualifiers create environments where transgender students can participate fully without facing rejection or exclusion. This approach supports the wellbeing of all students while maintaining clear communication about school activities and policies.